SB-91-0053-D. Disc. Comm. No. 91-1165 Precedential Processed

In Matter of Marquardt

Arizona Supreme Court · Filed November 15, 1991 · 821 P.2d 161

Cited by

City of Phoenix v. Orbitz Worldwide Ariz. 2019
Brenda D. v. Department of Child Safety 393 P.3d 930 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Claudia Patricia Higuera v. State of Arizona 383 P.3d 1150 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Gila River Indian Community v. Department of Child Safety 379 P.3d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Gric v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Courtney v. Hon. foster/courtney 334 P.3d 1272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Munger Chadwick, P.L.C. v. Farwest Development & Construction of the Southwest, LLC 329 P.3d 229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. Louis John Felix 317 P.3d 1185 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Balestrieri v. Balestrieri 300 P.3d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Lund v. Myers 286 P.3d 789 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Town of Marana v. Pima County 281 P.3d 1010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Madison v. Groseth 279 P.3d 633 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012

Opinion text

169 Ariz. 500 (1991) 821 P.2d 161 In the Matter of A Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Philip W. MARQUARDT, Respondent. No. SB-91-0053-D. Disc. Comm. No. 91-1165. Supreme Court of Arizona. November 15, 1991. Mark I. Harrison, Phoenix, for respondent. Harriet L. Turney, Chief Bar Counsel. JUDGMENT OF DISBARMENT In accordance with the provisions of Rule 56(b)(2), Disbarment by Consent, Ariz. R.S.Ct., and Respondent PHILIP W. MARQUARDT having consented to disbarment as a member of the State Bar of Arizona, and this Court having this date having accepted the Consent to Disbarment, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that PHILIP W. MARQUARDT be and hereby is disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Arizona and his license is hereby revoked, effective October 10, 1991. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 63(a), Ariz.R.S.Ct., PHILIP W. MARQUARDT shall notify all of his clients, within ten (10) days from the date hereof, of his inability to continue to represent them and that they should promptly retain new counsel, and shall promptly inform this Court of his compliance with this Order as provided by Rule 63(d), Ariz. R.S.Ct.